USPTO serial 78653241
POMEGA5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POMEGA5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANANSELMO, CA
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher E. George
Christopher E. George Morrison & Foerster LLPSuite 55002000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Antiperspirants; eyebrow cosmetics; eyebrow pencils; bath salts not for medical purposes; dead sea bath salts, deodorants for personal use; shampoos; hair lotions; cosmetic pencils; lipstick; mascara, eye shadow, eye and/or brow liners, lipstick, lip liner, face powder, bronzer, blusher, nail polish; nail care preparation; after-shave lotions; cleansing milks; all-purpose cleaning preparations; make-up powder; talcum powder for toiletry use; cosmetic for eyelashes; mascara, bubble bath, body and facial powders | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Appetite suppressants for medical use; medicated confectionery namely medicated chewing gum, candy drops and dietary food bar; dietetic beverages adapted for medical purposes; herb teas for medical purposes; medicated chewing gum; medicinal tea, namely, herbal teas for medicinal purpose; bath salts for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POMEGA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Tzeira, Sofer
- Other trademarks owned by Tzeira, Sofer
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named POMEGA5
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |