USPTO serial 78653284
DRIVELOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIVELOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
MIRIAM D TRUDELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR COMPUTER SECURITY AND ENCRYPTION, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENCRYPTION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY AND COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR ENCRYPTION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF COMPUTER HARD DISK DRIVES; COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR COMPUTER SECURITY AND ENCRYPTION, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENCRYPTION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY AND COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR ENCRYPTION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY, SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF COMPUTER HARD DISK DRIVES USED IN CONNECTION WITH PRODUCTS INCORPORATING DISK DRIVES AS A COMPONENT; COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR COMPUTER SECURITY AND ENCRYPTION, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENCRYPTION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY AND COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR ENCRYPTION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY, SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF COMPUTER HARD DISK DRIVES USED IN CONNECTION WITH SET TOP BOXES, PERSONAL VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS, DVD RECORDERS, VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS, TELEVISION SETS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, AUDIO TAPE PLAYERS AND RECORDERS, MOBILE PHONES AND CELLULAR PHONES | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |