Drawing for PROTECT

USPTO serial 78654496

PROTECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029MILK; CHOCOLATE MILK; SOY BASED BEVERAGES USED AS MILK SUBSTITUTES; MILK-BASED BEVERAGES CONTAINING COCOA, CHOCOLATE, COFFEE OR MALT; NON-FROZEN YOGURTS; SOYBEAN MILK USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE; SOY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGE USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTEACTIVE—
030COFFEE, COFFEE EXTRACTS USED AS FLAVORING, PREPARED COFFEE BASED BEVERAGES; ICED COFFEE; COFFEE SUBSTITUTES USED AS FLAVORING, EXTRACTS OF COFFEE SUBSTITUTES USED AS FLAVORING, COFFEE-SUBSTITUTE-BASED BEVERAGES; CHICORY BASED COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; TEA, TEA EXTRACTS USED AS FLAVORING, NON-ALCOHOLIC TEA-BASED BEVERAGES; ICED TEA; MALT EXTRACTS FOR FOOD; MALT FOR FOOD PURPOSES; COCOA AND COCOA-BASED BEVERAGES; CHOCOLATE; CHOCOLATE BEVERAGES NOT BEING DAIRY-BASED OR VEGETABLE-BASED; BREAKFAST CEREALS; MUESLI; CORN FLAKES; READY-TO-EAT CEREAL DERIVED FOOD BARS; READY-TO-EAT PROCESSED CEREALSACTIVE—
032NON-ALCOHOLIC, NON-CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; SYRUPS, EXTRACTS AND ESSENCES EXCEPT ESSENTIAL OILS FOR MAKING NON-ALCOHOLIC, NON-CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; SOYA-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING MILK SUBSTITUTES; MALT-BASED BEVERAGE MIXES IN POWDER IN LIQUID CONCENTRATE FORM; ISOTONIC BEVERAGESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 14, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance