Drawing for ASTROLOGIE

USPTO serial 78654584

ASTROLOGIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASTROLOGIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sareen Bezdikian Chalekian

Sareen Bezdikian Chalekian OURFALIAN & OURFALIAN700 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 1150Glendale, CA 91203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Apparel, namely, pants, shirts, and jackets.ACTIVEOct 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 28, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 27, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 22, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 28, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance