USPTO serial 78654858
B&B BIOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUKEN, BONNIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B&B BIOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pilot Point, TX
Pilot Point, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Schultz
GEORGE R. SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.5400 LBJ FWYSUITE 1200DALLAS, TX 75240-1067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Animal nutritional supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |