Drawing for BIAGIOTTI DUE

USPTO serial 78654880

BIAGIOTTI DUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIAGIOTTI DUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy M. Klass

JEREMY M KLASS C-2, MAILBOX 11THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYONE PROCTER & GAMBLE PLZCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery and cosmetic preparations, namely, toilet soaps, perfumes, eau de parfum, eau de toilette, after shave, body, hand and skin cleansers, lotions and creams, essential oils for personal use and deodorants for personal useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 21, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 15, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 27, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Apr 27, 2006PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Apr 25, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance