USPTO serial 78655324
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hudson, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and personal care products for the entire body namely the epidermis (skin) namely powders namely bath, talc, body; creams, lotions, liquids, gels, aqueous and non-aqueous liquid suspension and solutions for the epidermis (skin) namely for the reactivation of collagen namely treatment of wrinkles, aging skin, dry skin, skin health restoration, skin disorders, serum for the treatment of wrinkles, aging skin, dry skin, skin health restoration, skin disorders; moisturizing agents for the epidermis (skin); namely skin products for the entire body namely the epidermis (skin) namely powders namely baths, talc, body; creams and lotions and liquids and gels and aqueous and non-aqueous liquid suspensions and solutions for the epidermis (skin) | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |