USPTO serial 78655329
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
73529 Schwaebisch Gmuend-Bargau, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr.
WESLEY W WHITMYER JR ST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC HAND-HELD POWER TOOLS, NAMELY DRILLING MACHINES, CORE DRILLING MACHINES FOR METAL, SCREWDRIVERS, ANGLE GRINDERS, STRAIGHT GRINDERS, ECCENTRIC SANDERS, ROTARY SANDERS, ORBITAL SANDERS, BELT SANDERS, HALF-SHEET FINISHING SANDERS, TAPPERS, SHEET METAL SHEARS, NIBBLERS, JIG SAWS, CIRCULAR SAWS, OSCILLATING TRIANGLE SANDERS, OSCILLATING CUTTERS, ROUTERS; SPARE PARTS FOR AFOREMENTIONED POWER TOOLS; ACCESSORIES FOR OSCILLATING TOOLS, NAMELY SANDING PLATES, GRINDING DISKS, SAW-BLADES, CUTTING BLADES, SCRAPING BLADES; MOUNT-ON ELECTRIC MOTORS; DUST EXTRACTORS; CORDLESS DRILL-DRIVERS, CORDLESS IMPACT-DRIVERS, CHARGERS; HAMMER DRILLS; CIRCULAR SAWS, JIG SAWS, SABRE SAWS, IMPACT WRENCHES, DIE GRINDERS, ANGLE POLISHERS, MAGNETIC DRILL STANDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | BATTERIES AND CHARGERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |