Drawing for HIGH END POWER TOOLS

USPTO serial 78655329

HIGH END POWER TOOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HIGH END POWER TOOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr.

WESLEY W WHITMYER JR ST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC HAND-HELD POWER TOOLS, NAMELY DRILLING MACHINES, CORE DRILLING MACHINES FOR METAL, SCREWDRIVERS, ANGLE GRINDERS, STRAIGHT GRINDERS, ECCENTRIC SANDERS, ROTARY SANDERS, ORBITAL SANDERS, BELT SANDERS, HALF-SHEET FINISHING SANDERS, TAPPERS, SHEET METAL SHEARS, NIBBLERS, JIG SAWS, CIRCULAR SAWS, OSCILLATING TRIANGLE SANDERS, OSCILLATING CUTTERS, ROUTERS; SPARE PARTS FOR AFOREMENTIONED POWER TOOLS; ACCESSORIES FOR OSCILLATING TOOLS, NAMELY SANDING PLATES, GRINDING DISKS, SAW-BLADES, CUTTING BLADES, SCRAPING BLADES; MOUNT-ON ELECTRIC MOTORS; DUST EXTRACTORS; CORDLESS DRILL-DRIVERS, CORDLESS IMPACT-DRIVERS, CHARGERS; HAMMER DRILLS; CIRCULAR SAWS, JIG SAWS, SABRE SAWS, IMPACT WRENCHES, DIE GRINDERS, ANGLE POLISHERS, MAGNETIC DRILL STANDSACTIVE—
009BATTERIES AND CHARGERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 13, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance