USPTO serial 78655374
SEMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3212349Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2007
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cheonan-si, KR
Cheonan-si, KR
Cheonan-si, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Haarz
David R. Haarz HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC11730 Plaza AmericaSuite 600RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for manufacturing semiconductors, machines for cleaning [ semiconductors ] * semiconductor wafers *, machines for etching semiconductor wafers, machines for drying semiconductor wafers, photolithographic machines for developing semiconductor wafers, machines for coating semiconductor wafers, [ machines for manufacturing flat panel displays, machines for cleaning flat panel displays, machines for etching flat panel displays, photolithographic machines for developing flat panel displays, machines for coating flat panel displays, machines for drying flat panel displays, machines for manufacturing super twisted nematic liquid displays, machines for manufacturing organic light emitting diodes; material flow systems consisting primarily of conveyors for the transportation of flat panel displays during the manufacturing process; machines for manufacturing flat panel display modules ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |