Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78655908?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78655908. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SINUS RINSE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78655908, the listed owner(s) include: NeilMed Products, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78655908?

Serial number 78655908 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SINUS RINSE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover SINUS RINSE?

The public record lists International Classes: 005. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78655908

SINUS RINSE

Q: What is the current status of SINUS RINSE?

SINUS RINSE (78655908) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jun 22, 2005
Status date: Aug 19, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SINUS RINSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

NeilMed Products, Inc.
Santa Rosa, CA
Other trademarks owned by NeilMed Products, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa M. Martens

LISA M MARTENS FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
005	Pharmaceutical preparations for treatment of nasal ailments	ACTIVE	May 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 10, 2009	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 5, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
May 15, 2009	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Sep 30, 2008	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Sep 30, 2008	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Sep 30, 2008	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Aug 1, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 15, 2008	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 15, 2008	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 15, 2008	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Apr 3, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Apr 3, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Mar 31, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Mar 12, 2008	PGTT	PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED	—
Dec 6, 2007	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Nov 28, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 26, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 26, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Nov 26, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2007	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Sep 24, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 19, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 26, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 26, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Dec 28, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jul 18, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 18, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 17, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 3, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jun 27, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—