Drawing for SEAN JOHN UNFORGIVABLE

USPTO serial 78656133

SEAN JOHN UNFORGIVABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEAN JOHN UNFORGIVABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lesley A. Moradian

LESLEY A MORADIAN THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC767 5TH AVE FL 46NEW YORK, NY 10153-0023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003fragrances for personal use; cosmetics; non-medicated skin care preparations; hair care preparations; non-medicated toiletries; non-medicated sun care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 26, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 26, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 22, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance