Drawing for ETMC

USPTO serial 78656261

ETMC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3257770Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2007
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ETMC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul W. Kruse

Paul W. Kruse SPENCER FANE LLP511 UNION STREET, SUITE 1000NASHVILLE, TN 38219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Emergency medical assistance; food nutrition consultation; health care services; hospital services; medical laboratory services; medical services; nutritional counseling; providing pharmaceutical advice; physical therapy services; physician services; psychological testing; providing health care information by telephoneACTIVEOct 22, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 14, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 11, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 4, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 11, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 12, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 6, 2017COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 27, 2017ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 10, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 10, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 13, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 30, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 30, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 20, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 22, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance