CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CLIP-CHIP

USPTO serial 78656391

CLIP-CHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLIP-CHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter K. Hahn

PETER K HAHN LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP600 W BROADWAY STE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3372UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Research equipment, namely, protease and inhibitors microarrayACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 18, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 18, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 23, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 30, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 18, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 12, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance