USPTO serial 78656437
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax Alvarez
Dax Alvarez BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSeventh FloorLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1040| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Dough and icing mold inhibitors; dough and icing stabilizers | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Candied fruits for making glace fruit; jams and jellies; egg substitute; shortening; vegetable oil; fruit, nut and whipped toppings; fruit based fillings for bakery goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bulk food mixes for bakery goods; cake mixes; donut mixes; flour; Danish mixes; biscuit mixes; muffin mixes; scone mixes; cookie and brownie mixes; bread mixes; custard and pudding dessert powders; meringue powder; icings; glazes for donuts and bakery goods; writing and outlining jells for decorating cakes and pastries; candy and sugar baking decorations; sugar; yeast; dough; food flavoring extracts not being essential oils; chocolate, marshmallow, and custard fillings for bakery goods; chocolate and marshmallow toppings; topping syrups; variety of bakery goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorship services in the field of bakery supplies and bakery equipment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |