Drawing for PRESTIGE PANEL

USPTO serial 78656734

PRESTIGE PANEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRESTIGE PANEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd Deveau

TODD DEVEAU THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY LLP100 GALLERIA PKWY SE STE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339-5961UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal panels for use in construction of building roofsACTIVEJul 16, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 19, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 23, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 18, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 3, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 15, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 5, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 16, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 16, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 16, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance