USPTO serial 78656743
AUSTRALIAN BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUSTRALIAN BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE PLC277 S WASHINGTON STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3646UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed swing tickets, paper tags and decalcomanias for labeling plants, plant pots, seedling trays and punnets; pictorial paper labels, printed paper labels, push-in paper labels, tie-on paper labels; printed matter, namely, leaflets about horticultural products for information and marketing purposes, posters, catalogues in the field of horticultural products for information and marketing purposes, paper and paper articles, cardboard and cardboard articles, namely, labels, brochures, pamphlets, tags, catalogs and flowerpot covers for promotion, labeling and marking horticultural products | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic hang tags and plastic labels, namely, pictorial labels, push-in labels and tie-on labels for labeling plants, plant pots, seedling trays and punnets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |