USPTO serial 78656820
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Dweck,
JEFFREY S DWECK100 W 33RD ST STE 1017NEW YORK, NY 10001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical Appliances, namely-- Electric Irons, CD Players and DVD Players, Audio and Video Receivers; Electronic Remote Control Devices for radios, televisions and stereos; Modems; Electronic Personal Organizers; Electronic Pens; Computer Central Processing Units; Radio and Television Sets; Audio Tape-Recorders; Video Tape-Recorders; Video Display Sets; Video Cameras; Am and Fm Radio Tuners; Stereo Receivers; Electronic Amplifiers for Sound Systems; Loudspeakers; Steam Irons, Automobile Accessories, namely-- Voltage Regulators for Vehicles, Vehicle Breakdown Warning Triangles, Electric Cigarette Lighters for Automobiles, Alarms for Anti-Intrusion, Burglar, Fire, Personal Safety and Theft, Electrical Accumulators, Speedometers, Navigational Instruments for use in Automobiles, namely, global positioning system (GPS), Security Devices, Namely Electrical and Electronic Fire Alarm Systems, Smoke Alarm Systems, Intruder Alarm Systems, and Electric And Electronic Locks, and parts therefor; Timing Sensors, Power Sensors, Temperature Sensors, Light Sensors, Current Sensors, Voltage Sensors, Motion Sensors and Security Alarm Sensors, Computer Accessories, namely-- Amplifiers, Compact Disc Players, Computer Keyboards, Computer Memories, Computer Peripheral Devices, Video Game Machines for use with Televisions, Horns of Loudspeakers, Loudspeakers, Computer Loudspeakers, Computer Monitors, Computer Hardware, Computer Mouse, Periscopes for Computers, Flash Card Readers, Bar Code Readers, Television Sets, Video Tape Recorders, Video Screens, Digital Video Disc Drives, Liquid Crystal Display, Plasma Display Panels, Uninterruptible Power Supplies, Power Supplies, Computer Joysticks, Driver Safety Alarms for alerting drivers of objects behind or in front of a vehicle, Ultrasonic Cleaner, Personal Security Alarms, Head Phones, Radios, Cell Phone Stands, Voice memo telephone, tape, and cassette recorders, Wireless Flashing Safety Light with Torch | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |