USPTO serial 78656951
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Penny S. Lennox
Elizabeth A.Walker Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLPOne Lincoln StreetState Street Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer game software; computer software for use in gaming machines; electronic gaming machines; computer software for online payment and transaction processing; video game machines for use with televisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | cards, namely bingo cards, lottery cards and keno cards and tickets, namely lottery tickets, for playing games of chance; computer game machines, namely stand alone video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |