USPTO serial 78656956
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Kissinger
THOMAS F KISSINGER THE MARCUS CORPORATION100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1900MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4132UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | provision of movie theatre services, namely the exhibition of motion pictures on an UltraScreen movie screen | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |