USPTO serial 78657175
Serial No. 78657175
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78657175?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Wright
SANDRA WRIGHT RICHARDS BUELL SUTTON LLPSTE 700; 401 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER BCC V6B 5A1,CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Jeans; Wearing apparel, namely, T-shirts, shirts, blouses, vests, knitted shirts, woven shirts, polo shirts, sweaters, dress shirts, turtlenecks, tunics, halter tops, tube tops, tank tops, cardigans, jerseys, denim shirts, hooded tops, hooded sweaters, pants, overalls, slacks, trousers, capri pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, fleece tops, fleece bottoms, suits, bandanas, belts, suspenders and neckties; Swimwear, namely, swim suits, swim caps and beach cover-ups; Athletic wear, namely, sweatshirts, sweatpants, exercise pants, shorts, sport shirts, golf shirts, jumpsuits, track suits, athletic uniforms, warmup suits and jogging suits; Intimate wear, namely, panties, underwear, briefs, boxer shorts, socks, pantyhose, hosiery, tights, leggings, leotards, leg warmers, lingerie, camisoles, chemises, brassieres, slips, negligee, garter belts, teddies, girdles, corsets, bodysuits, nighties, sleepwear, bathrobes, robes, housecoats and undershirts; Outwear, namely, jackets, sports jackets, denim jackets, rain resistant jackets, wind resistant jackets, sport jackets, leather jackets, suede jackets, hooded jackets, bomber jackets, coats, overcoats, trench coats, pullovers, blazers, capes, parkas, shawls, ponchos, gloves, mittens, muffs and scarves; Headgear, namely, caps, hats, toques, headbands, visors and berets; Footwear, namely, casual shoes, dress shoes, athletic shoes, sandals, thongs and boots and slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |