USPTO serial 78657210
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman, Esq.
BETH M GOLDMAN ESQ HELLER EHRMAN LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toiletries, namely, perfumes, colognes and eaux de toilette, scented body spray, perfume oils, body lotions, shampoos, hair conditioners, bath oils and salts, bath soaps, bath gels, bubble bath, skin soap, body oil, body powder, skin moisturizers, body and eye cream, and cosmetics, namely, mascaras, lipsticks, lip glosses, cosmetic pencils, eye pencils, eye shadows, eyeliners, eye make up remover, foundation, face powder, blusher, hair gel and hair styling preparations, nail enamel, nail polish, and potpourri | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |