USPTO serial 78657229
HI-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HI-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip H. Gottfried, Esq.
PHILIP H GOTTFRIED ESQ AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVE FL 21NEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | ATHLETIC BAGS; ATTACHE CASES; BABY CARRIERS WORN ON THE BODY; BACKPACKS; BEACH BAGS; BEACH UMBRELLAS; BELT BAGS; BILLFOLDS; BOOK BAGS; BRIEFCASE TYPE PORTFOLIOS; BRIEFCASES; BUSINESS CARD CASES; CD HOLDERS SOLD EMPTY; CARRY ON BAGS; NON MOTORIZED COLLAPSIBLE LUGGAGE CARTS; CHANGE PURSES; CLUTCH BAGS; CLUTCH PURSES; COIN PURSES; COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY; CREDIT CARD CASES; DIAPER BAGS; DOCUMENT CASES; DRAWSTRING POUCHES; DUFFEL BAGS; FANNY PACKS; FELT POUCHES; GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL; GOLF UMBRELLAS; GYM BAGS; HANDBAGS; HAT BOXES FOR TRAVEL; INFANT CARRIERS WORN ON THE BODY; KEY CASES; KNAPSACKS; LUGGAGE; LUNCH BAGS; OVERNIGHT BAGS; OVERNIGHT CASES; PARASOLS; PASSPORT CASES, HOLDERS OR WALLETS; PATIO UMBRELLAS; POCKETBOOKS; PURSES; SATCHELS; TRAVEL SATCHELS; SCHOOL BAGS; SCHOOL BOOK BAGS; SHOE BAGS FOR TRAVEL; LEATHER SHOPPING BAGS; MESH SHOPPING BAGS; TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS; SHOULDER BAGS; ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS; SPORTSMAN'S HUNTING BAGS; SPORTS BAGS; SUITCASES; TOILETRY CASES SOLD EMPTY; TOTE BAGS; TRAVEL BAGS; TRUNKS FOR TRAVELING; UMBRELLAS; VALISES; VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY; WAIST PACKS; WALKING CANES FOR NON MEDICAL PURPOSES; and, WALLETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |