Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78657232?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78657232. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DIAMONDBLADE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78657232, the listed owner(s) include: Diamond Blade Oy.

What is USPTO serial number 78657232?

Serial number 78657232 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DIAMONDBLADE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover DIAMONDBLADE?

The public record lists International Classes: 007. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: DIAMONDBLADE Serial# 78657232 | status 603; last event MAB3 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of DIAMONDBLADE?

DIAMONDBLADE (78657232) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMONDBLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Diamond Blade Oy
Parhalahti, FI
Other trademarks owned by Diamond Blade Oy

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald J. Kubovcik

RONALD J KUBOVCIK KUBOVCIK & KUBOVCIKTHE FARRAGUT BLDG900 17TH ST NW STE 710WASHINGTON, DC 20006-2515

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Machine parts for papermaking equipment, namely, carbide-tipped coating blades and creping blades	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 11, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 31, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 30, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 2, 2007	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Feb 12, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Feb 12, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Aug 11, 2006	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jul 18, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 18, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 18, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 28, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

DIAMONDBLADE