USPTO serial 78657314
Serial No. 78657314
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78657314?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Hutchings Reed
MARY HUTCHINGS REED WINSTON & STRAWN35 W WACKER DR STE 3600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1723UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen and canned vegetables; frozen and canned fruits; frozen potatoes; frozen waffles; eggs; cottage cheese; cheese; coffee creamer; sour cream; canned soups; whipped cream; potato chips; frozen seafood and fish; fresh seafood and fish; canned tuna fish; fresh meats; packaged lunch meats; deli style lunch meats; packaged fruit, garden, vegetable salads; shortening; mayonnaise; packaged pickles; olives; canned and freshly prepared baked beans; dairy-based chip dips; cooking oil; namely corn oil, peanut oil, olive oil, vegetable oil, sunflower oil, weiners, cooked roasted chickens; bacon; cooked barbecued ribs; packaged lunch and dinner entrees comprised of meat; canned and fresh grated cheeses; evaporated milk; assorted dehydrated fruit snacks; dairy products, namely milk, butter milk, chocolate milk, chocolate malted milk, half and half, eggnog; powdered soup mix; and yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea bags, prepared biscuit, roll, bread stick and bread doughs; crackers, snack crackers, graham crackers, animal crackers, and saltine crackers; chocolate baking chips; baking soda; assorted candies; chewy granola bars; butter; margarine; ice cream; cooking rice; flour; stuffing mix containing bread; cookies; cakes; bread crumbs; prepared graham cracker pie crusts; breakfast cereals; garlic powder; noodles; fresh bakery goods; pancake syrups; tortilla chips; popped popcorn; pretzels; corn chips; corn curls; bagels; peanuts; mixed nuts; cashews; snack bars; raisins; packaged puddings; frozen vegetables with pasta; black pepper; salt; seasoned salt; seafood cocktail sauce; vinegar; mustard; ketchup; chili sauce; vanilla extract; pickle relishes; packaged macaroni; pasta; rice salads; and packaged lunch and dinner entrees comprised of pasta; pizza | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |