USPTO serial 78657947
AMDEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3808567Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMDEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss
Lisa M. DuRoss HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.PO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Conservatories, porches, and garden prefabricated buildings made from metal; self assembly porches and garden prefabricated buildings made from metal; metal building materials, namely, metal window frames, metal door frames, metal doors, metal glazing bars, metal ridge beams, metal eaves beams, metal gutters, metal sealing gaskets, metal decorative moldings, metal crestings and finials, metal supports, metal conservatory roofs; exterior window blinds for use in conservatories,porches, summer houses and garden buildings made from metal; metal parts and fittings for all of the above said goods, namely, brackets, bolts, nails, rivets, screws, brads, clamps, pins, and nuts; metal window blind hardware, namely, wall brackets and supports, finials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1996 |
| 019 | (Based on Section 44(e) Non-fixed, non-metal structures, namely, moveable summer houses and garden prefabricated buildings; Non-fixed non-metal structures, namely, moveable self assembly summer houses and garden prefabricated buildings; Non-fixed wooden structures, namely, moveable summer houses and garden prefabricated buildings; Non-fixed wooden structures, namely, moveable self assembly summer houses and garden prefabricated buildings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | (Based on Section 44(e) Furniture for conservatories and garden buildings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | (Based on Section 44(e) Constructing and erecting conservatories and garden buildings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Surveying, planning, and designing services for others in the field of the building of conservatories, porches, summer houses, and garden buildings; interior décor design for others, relating to the building of conservatories, porches, summer houses, and garden buildings; consultancy, information, and advisory services in the field of surveying, planning, designing, and interior décor design of conservatories, porches, summer houses, and garden buildings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amdega Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Amdega Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Amdega Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AMDEGA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |