CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TELEQUOTE

USPTO serial 78657960

TELEQUOTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELEQUOTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent A. Lee

Kent A. Lee REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C.1000 N WATER ST STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3197UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing health insurance information, namely, providing an automated interactive voice response system that allows customers and agents to obtain health insurance information; health insurance brokerage; health insurance administration; health insurance underwritingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 9, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance