Drawing for HYDRA-HEAL

USPTO serial 78657996

HYDRA-HEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDRA-HEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl M. Zielaznicki

KARL M ZIELAZNICKI C/O DOCKETING DEPTTROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair colorings, color rinses, hair bleaches, color developers, color intensifiers, hair conditioners, hair detanglers, shampoos, hair styling mousse, gel and spray, rouge, hand lotion, hand cream, face lotion, face cream, face powder, lip stick, lip glosses, eye makeup, eye shadow, makeup, pressed powder, blusher, under-eye concealer, loose powder, mascara, eyeliner, lip liner, eye brow pencil, perfume, cologne, suntan oil, nail polish, nail enamel, bath and shower gels and bath salts; toilet soaps; body deodorants; cosmetics, namely, creams, milks, lotions, gels and powders for the face, the body and the hands; sun care preparations, namely, sun block, sun screen, sun creams, sun tan lotion, sun tan gel and sun tan oil; gels, sprays, mousses and balms for the hair styling and hair care; hair lacquers; hair coloring and hair decolorant preparations; permanent waving and curling preparations; essential oils for personal use; dentifrices; nail care preparations; non-medicated skin care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 17, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance