Drawing for OSTIONATO

USPTO serial 78658684

OSTIONATO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OSTIONATO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel D. Chapman

Daniel D. Chapman Jackson Walker L.L.P.112 E. Pecan, Suite 2400San Antonio, TX 78205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic mixture of tomato juice, oyster juice, orange juice, lime juice and spices for use with alcohol-containing beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 11, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 7, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 4, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 15, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2007IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 11, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Feb 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance