USPTO serial 78658726
SECURING THE HOMELAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3346467Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- BROMAGHIM, PETER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SECURING THE HOMELAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marilyn R. Khorsandi
MARILYN R KHORSANDI KHORSANDI PATENT LAW GROUP, A LAW CORP140 S LAKE AVE STE 312PASADENA, CA 91101-4710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ENGINEERING; DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES PROVIDED FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE SOLUTIONS, FACILITY PROTECTION SOLUTIONS, AND PHYSICAL AND ELECTRONIC SECURITY SOLUTIONS; AND TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL AND ELECTRONIC SECURITY SOLUTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2003 |
| 045 | PROVIDING CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE; PROVIDING CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL AND ELECTRONIC SECURITY, NAMELY, FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY NEEDS OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES AND FACILITIES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FACILITY PROTECTION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |