Drawing for LA CAPPELLA

USPTO serial 78659202

LA CAPPELLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA CAPPELLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

Beth M. Goldman Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP4 Park PlazaSuite 1600Irvine, CA 92614-2558

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed vegetables; canned vegetables; canned tomatoes; vegetable paste; vegetable puree; tomato paste; tomato pureeACTIVE—
030Sauces; tomato-based sauces; ready-made sauces; tomato sauce; canned tomato sauce; pizza sauce; spaghetti and pasta sauce; marinara sauce; salsaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 22, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 27, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 30, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 9, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance