USPTO serial 78659544
COSMOPOLITAN JEANSWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COSMOPOLITAN JEANSWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B.Krongold
JEFFREY B. KRONGOLD SCHAEFFER & KRONGOLSD LLP450 7TH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10123-0101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Denim Jeans | ABANDONED | Jun 13, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2009 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |