USPTO serial 78659652
Serial No. 78659652
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3695983Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 78659652?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
1800 Vevey, CH
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
1800 Vevey, CH
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
1800 Vevey, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline M. Stelling
Jacqueline M. Stelling Nestle Nutrition12 Vreeland Road, 2nd FloorFlorham Park, NJ 07932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic foods adapted for medical use; food and food substances for babies and infants; food for medically restricted diets, namely, for use by invalids and nursing mothers; nutritional and dietary supplements; vitamin preparations; mineral food supplements; medicated confectionery; high nutritional vitamins and minerals formed and packaged as cereal bars; meal replacement bars; nutritional energy bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked vegetables; meat; poultry; game; fish; seafood; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; lactic acid fermented beverages; soy based food beverages for use as a milk substitute; milk based beverages containing fruit juice; chocolate milk; yogurt; soy milk; milk; cream; cheese; protein for use as a food additive; non-dairy creamer; soups; preparations for making soups, namely, concentrates; chicken, beef and vegetable stock cubes; bouillon; broth based soup, namely, consommés | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, coffee based beverages containing milk; iced coffee; coffee substitutes; chicory based coffee substitutes; coffee extracts used as flavoring; tea; tea extracts used as flavoring; tea based preparations and beverages; iced tea; cocoa; cocoa-based beverages; chocolate; sweets; candy; biscuits; cakes; cookies; wafers; toffees; puddings; ice cream; flavored water ices; sherbets; frozen confections; frozen cakes; flavored soft ices; frozen desserts, namely, ice milk and fruit ice; frozen yogurts; powdered and liquid mixes for making ice cream, water ices, sherbets, frozen confections, and frozen cakes; breakfast cereals; muesli; corn flakes; ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; ready-to-eat processed cereals; rice; pasta; noodles; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; pizza; sandwiches; mixtures of alimentary paste and oven-ready prepared dough; sauces; soy sauce; aromatizing seasonings for food; edible spices; condiments, namely, mayonnaise and mustard | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Still water; drinking water, namely, carbonated effervescent water and processed water; spring water; mineral water; flavored water; fruit drinks; fruit and vegetable juices; fruit nectars; lemonades; soft drinks; syrups, extracts and essences for making non-alcoholic, non-carbonated soft drinks; isotonic beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | RG1B | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REQUEST TO DELETE 1(B) FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |