USPTO serial 78659854
ATHLETE AT WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATHLETE AT WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie J. Mableson
CONNIE J MABLESON LIEBERMAN, DODGE, GERDING, & ANDERSON, L3003 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1800PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM NAMELY, CLASSES, COACHING, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, PROGRAMS, AND COURSES OF INSTRUCTION FEATURING SKILLS AND STRATEGIES APPLICABLE TO THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY DERIVED FROM RESEARCH ON AND EXPERIENCES OF WORLD CLASS ATHLETES AND APPLIED SPORT SCIENTISTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |