Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78660166?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78660166. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns LA INDITA MICHOACANA?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78660166, the listed owner(s) include: Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc., Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc., Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc., PALETERIA LA MICHOACANA (SUB), INC, PALETERIA LA MICHOACANA, LLC, PLM OPERATIONS, LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 78660166?

Serial number 78660166 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark LA INDITA MICHOACANA. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of LA INDITA MICHOACANA?

LA INDITA MICHOACANA (78660166) currently shows USPTO status code 713 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover LA INDITA MICHOACANA?

The public record lists International Classes: 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78660166

LA INDITA MICHOACANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3210304Status 713

Filing date: Jun 28, 2005
Status date: Sep 20, 2018
Registration date: Feb 20, 2007
Examiner: PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office: TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA INDITA MICHOACANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

LAURA CHAPMAN SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP4 EMBARCADERO CENTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	ice cream and fruit ice products, namely fruit bars	SECTION 18 - CANCELLED	Feb 21, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 20, 2018	C18.	CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL	—
Sep 20, 2018	CANT	CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999	—
Sep 20, 2018	CTDA	CT DECISION: AFFIRMED	—
Mar 18, 2017	NA89	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED	—
Mar 18, 2017	RNL1	REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)	The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 18, 2017	89AG	REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED	The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 18, 2017	APRE	CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	—
Jan 23, 2017	E89R	TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED	—
May 11, 2016	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Apr 27, 2016	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Feb 20, 2016	REM2	COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED	—
Apr 16, 2014	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Nov 4, 2013	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2013	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
May 1, 2013	PPCD	PENDING PETITION/COURT DECISION	—
Mar 11, 2013	NOSU	NOTICE OF SUIT	—
Mar 9, 2013	NAS8	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED	—
Mar 9, 2013	8.OK	REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED	The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Mar 9, 2013	APRE	CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	—
Mar 7, 2013	NOSU	NOTICE OF SUIT	—
Feb 19, 2013	ES8R	TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED	—
Jun 6, 2012	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
May 14, 2012	TPDR	TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED	—
Apr 23, 2012	TPDR	TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED	—
Jul 19, 2011	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2011	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
May 20, 2011	CANG	CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999	—
Feb 16, 2011	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Oct 25, 2010	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2010	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Dec 28, 2009	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Oct 16, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 27, 2007	PETC	CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999	—
Feb 20, 2007	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Oct 17, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Oct 13, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 10, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 3, 2006	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Oct 3, 2006	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 3, 2006	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Sep 12, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 8, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 8, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2006	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 27, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 27, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 8, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 19, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 5, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—