USPTO serial 78660237
FLASHCAR FLASHLIGHT NEVER BE WITHOUT A FLASHLIGHT AGAIN!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLASHCAR FLASHLIGHT NEVER BE WITHOUT A FLASHLIGHT AGAIN!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
Traverse City, MI
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
Traverse City, MI
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
Traverse City, MI
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Washburn
KEVIN M WASHBURN SMITH & JOHNSON, ATTORNEYS PCPO BOX 705TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49685-0705UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | flashlight in the shape of a car which also attaches to portable handheld devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 24, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Advertising Specialties, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named FLASHCAR FLASHLIGHT NEVER BE WITHOUT A FLASHLIGHT AGAIN!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |