USPTO serial 78660253
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Rynkiewicz
JOHN P RYNKIEWICZ KAYE SCHOLER LLP901 15TH ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2329| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable music via a global computer network and wireless devices; sound recordings featuring music; multimedia software recorded on CD-ROMS and computer software for editing, storing, sharing, burning, streaming and downloading of music; downloadable computer software for editing, storing, sharing, burning, streaming and downloading of music and digital media files | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring downloadable pre-recorded music; computerized database management of online digital media; subscription to an online digital music ordering service; online ordering services featuring musical sound recordings; providing commercial information directories in the field of music, radio and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Digital radio broadcasting; electronic transmission of audio and video files via communications networks; providing electronic bulletin boards for a transmission of messages among users concerning music and entertainment; chat rooms featuring an online community for a transmission of messages among users concerning music and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing pre-recorded music, musical playlists, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network, databases in the fields of music, radio and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |