USPTO serial 78660465
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CMA COSMETICS INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED
FLORAL PARK, NY
Other trademarks owned by CMA COSMETICS INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED
Boyd's Madison Avenue Dept. Store, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Boyd's Madison Avenue Dept. Store, Inc.
Boyd's Madison Avenue Dept. Store, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Boyd's Madison Avenue Dept. Store, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwen Acker-Wood
Gwen Acker-Wood Acker Wood Intellectual Property Law, LLCP.O.Box 11096Pittsburgh, PA 15237UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Deodorant soaps, skin bronzing gel for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans, herbal eye pads for soothing and decreasing swelling of eyelids, general purpose scouring powder, skin cream, essential oils for personal use, essential oils for use in the manufacturing of cosmetics, personal deodorants, deodorant antiperspirants, artificial eyelashes and remover sold as a unit, lipstick, lip gloss, eye liner, eye shadow, rouge, body powder, non-medicated blemish cover-up cream, mascara, mascara remover, eye liner liquid, eye liner sealer, moisturizer skin cream, eyebrow pencils, bath oils, body oils, hair lotions | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |