Drawing for BOYD'S BABES

USPTO serial 78660465

BOYD'S BABES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOYD'S BABES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gwen Acker-Wood

Gwen Acker-Wood Acker Wood Intellectual Property Law, LLCP.O.Box 11096Pittsburgh, PA 15237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Deodorant soaps, skin bronzing gel for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans, herbal eye pads for soothing and decreasing swelling of eyelids, general purpose scouring powder, skin cream, essential oils for personal use, essential oils for use in the manufacturing of cosmetics, personal deodorants, deodorant antiperspirants, artificial eyelashes and remover sold as a unit, lipstick, lip gloss, eye liner, eye shadow, rouge, body powder, non-medicated blemish cover-up cream, mascara, mascara remover, eye liner liquid, eye liner sealer, moisturizer skin cream, eyebrow pencils, bath oils, body oils, hair lotionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 22, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance