USPTO serial 78660979
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric P. Bergner, Esq.
ERIC P BERGNER ESQ MOSES & SINGER LLP405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-1299UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely production of radio programs, radio entertainment production, radio programming, scheduling of radio programming, and distribution of radio programs for others; and, online services, namely providing a website featuring information about radio programs and issues of interest and concern to women, namely, sports, music, movies, fashion, cooking, weddings, parenting, astrology, beauty, relationships, books, fitness, nutrition and gardening; providing newsletters in the fields of radio programming and issues of interest or concern to women, namely, sports, music, movies, fashion, cooking, weddings, parenting, astrology, beauty, medicine, relationships, travel, books, fitness, nutrition and gardening via e-mail | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |