Drawing for FRIENDSHIP COUCH

USPTO serial 78661047

FRIENDSHIP COUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRIENDSHIP COUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward M. Weisz

EDWARD M WEISZ COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 5TH AVE RM 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176-0091UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture of all kinds; namely, sofas, couches, upholstered sofas and upholstered couches.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 17, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 17, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 31, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance