USPTO serial 78661200
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner, Esq.
MARK A STEINER ESQ TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing advertising for others for the treatment of diseases pertaining to the disciplines of ophthalmology, cardiology, endocrinology, psychiatry, respirology, neurology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology, and expressly excluding cosmetic and plastic surgical treatments and procedures; providing business consulting services, training, and seminars for others concerning the treatment of diseases pertaining to the disciplines of ophthalmology, cardiology, endocrinology, psychiatry, respirology, neurology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology, and expressly excluding cosmetic and plastic surgical treatments and procedures; providing subscriptions to electronic journals to others concerning the treatment of diseases pertaining to the disciplines of ophthalmology, cardiology, endocrinology, psychiatry, respirology, neurology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology, and expressly excluding cosmetic and plastic surgical treatments and procedures | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | disseminating information to others concerning the treatment of diseases pertaining to the disciplines of ophthalmology, cardiology, endocrinology, psychiatry, respirology, neurology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology, and expressly excluding cosmetic and plastic surgical treatments and procedures | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |