Drawing for STYLE STARTS HERE

USPTO serial 78661390

STYLE STARTS HERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STYLE STARTS HERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore R. Remaklus

Theodore R. Remaklus Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P.2700 Carew Tower441 Vine StreetCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Fragrances for personal use, eau de toilette, eau de cologne, eau de parfume, skin treatment preparations, namely non-medicated skin creams and lotions, moisturizers for hands, body and face, skin clarifier, skin cleansing creams and lotionsACTIVE—
014Jewelry, watchesACTIVE—
018Umbrellas, handbags, leather and imitation leather goods, namely, wallets, coin purses, luggage, travel bagsACTIVE—
025Women's, men's and children's clothing, namely, sweaters, shirts, trousers, dresses, skirts, suits, jackets, shorts, blouses, coats, scarves, gloves, hats, intimate apparel, footwear, boots, hosiery, sock, belts, swimwear, loungewearACTIVE—
035Retail store services, mail order catalog services, telephone shop at home services, and electronic retailing services via a computer featuring fragrances, skin treatment preparations, jewelry, watches, umbrellas, handbags, luggage, leather and imitation leather goods, and women's, men's and children's clothingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance