Drawing for CLEAR IMPRESSIONS

USPTO serial 78661586

CLEAR IMPRESSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEYER, ELIZABETH L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAR IMPRESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Boshinski, Esq.

THOMAS A BOSHINSKI ESQ MEADWESTVACO CORPORATIONCOURTHOUSE PLZ NEDAYTON, OH 45463-0001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016date planners and student assignment booksACTIVEMar 24, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 27, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 12, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 12, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 27, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 27, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 30, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance