USPTO serial 78661861
NO LIMIT FASHION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO LIMIT FASHION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valery Milgrom
VALERY MILGROM PALANT & MILGROM PC299 BROADWAY STE 605NEW YORK, NY 10007-1994UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | All clothing apparel, namely, hats, ski hats, headbands, ski masks, mufflers, scarves, under shirts, tank tops, crop tops, T-shirts, shirts, blouses, coats, jackets, wind resisting jackets, jerseys, sports bra, sweat shirts, sweaters, vests, pullovers, overalls, trousers, exercise apparel, namely, yoga tops, parkas, outerwear jackets, ski suits, overcoats, ponchos, sleep wear, namely, pajamas, robes, tunics, swim suits, dress shirts, gloves, mittens, sweat bands, belts, scarf belts, bicycle shorts, jeans, pants, shorts, sweat pants, tights, yoga pants, yoga shorts, yoga bottoms, boxers, skirts, dresses, swim trunks, leggings, shoes, socks, slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |