CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KAORI GINJO BOUQUET ÉLÉGANT JUNMAI GINJO SAKE KYOTO JAPAN SINCE 1673 TAMANOHIKARI

USPTO serial 78662047

KAORI GINJO BOUQUET ÉLÉGANT JUNMAI GINJO SAKE KYOTO JAPAN SINCE 1673 TAMANOHIKARI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3221491Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with KAORI GINJO BOUQUET ÉLÉGANT JUNMAI GINJO SAKE KYOTO JAPAN SINCE 1673 TAMANOHIKARI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. Bruce Hamburg

C BRUCE HAMBURG JORDAN & HAMBURG LLP122 E 42ND ST RM 4000NEW YORK, NY 10168-0069UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033sake (Japanese rice wine)SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 21, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance