USPTO serial 78662395
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan D. Rector
SUSAN D RECTOR SCHOTTENSTEIN, ZOX & DUNN CO LPAPO BOX 165020COLUMBUS, OH 43216-5020UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Production of radio and television commercials; preparing audio-visual presentations for use in training in the fields of advertising, marketing, public relations and business; developing advertising and content for use by others in marketing and sales of goods and services; business meeting planning | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2004 |
| 041 | Production of films and videos; production of video and multi-media presentations; video and film editing; special effects animation services for film and video; meeting, seminar and special event planning and consultation; production of marketing, public relations and training presentations; business training; and training in the fields of marketing and public relations | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |