Drawing for NATURALLY FRESH

USPTO serial 78662753

NATURALLY FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURALLY FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurence P. Colton

Laurence P. Colton Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP1230 Peachtree Street, N.E.Suite 3100, Promeanade IIAtlanta, GA 30359

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fruit and vegetable salads; fruit salads; garden salads; potato salad; pre-cut vegetable salad; salads except macaroni, rice, and pasta saladACTIVE—
030macaroni salad, rice salad, and pasta saladACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 19, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 19, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 17, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 23, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 23, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 24, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance