Drawing for A BETTER VISION FOR VALUATION

USPTO serial 78662863

A BETTER VISION FOR VALUATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A BETTER VISION FOR VALUATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John B. Greenberg

JOHN B GREENBERG THE STOLAR PARTNERSHIP LLP911 WASHINGTON AVE FL 7SAINT LOUIS, MO 63101-1243UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate services, namely, valuations, evaluations and appraisals of residential and commercial real property, and personal property situated thereon; real estate services, namely, property risk management and real estate information services, all of the aforementioned services provided personally and/or via telephone, cable, mail, computer application software, the global computer network and/or other similar means of communicationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 24, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance