USPTO serial 78662964
THE MUSE JR.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE MUSE JR.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fountain Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRADLEY SNIDERMAN
BRADLEY SNIDERMAN THE LAW OFFICE OF BRADLEY M SNIDERMAN23679 CALABASAS RDCALABASAS, CA 91302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Children's multiactivity toys; Electronic toys; musical toys; toys which produce sound; toys which produce music; musical toys which respond to touch; musical toys with keyboards; musical toys with embedded computer hardware and/or software; toys with musical keyboards; toys for music education; Children's musical instruments; toy musical instruments; electronic musical toys; electronic musical keyboards; Musical toys with embedded computer hardware and/or software, musical toys which produce pleasing music however they are played | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |