Drawing for MONDIAEN VIRTUAL STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

USPTO serial 78663465

MONDIAEN VIRTUAL STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONDIAEN VIRTUAL STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David P. Gordon

DAVID P GORDON GORDON & JACOBSON PC60 LONG RIDGE RD STE 407STAMFORD, CT 06902-1840UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial affairs and financial services, namely, fund investment, capital investment, financial management, capital management, monetary affairs, namely, foreign exchange dealings and development of investment models, banking, namely stock and bond trading on a commission basis; option trading for others, providing current savings-accounts and checking accounts, providing mortgage secured loans for others, capital management, financing of stock trading, mediation with regard to the capital market transactions, financial management of funds, financial management of stock shares and capital of private individuals and capital of corporate investors; consultancy and mediation with regard to the aforementioned services; financial consultancy; financial analysis; venture capital financingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 22, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance