Drawing for THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 78663694

THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3072345Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 21, 2006
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Cumbow

Robert C. Cumbow Miller Nash LLP605 5th Ave S., Suite 900Seattle, WA 98104United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing education, seminars and training courses for others to promote use of the dispute resolution board processACTIVENov 25, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2026E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2026ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 5, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 5, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2012COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Sep 22, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 17, 2012ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 14, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance